<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="TheVampireBat">
  <review>
    <reviewbody>this film stars Fay Wray of "king Kong" and Dwight Frye who played renfield in the lugosi classic "dracula".
this is a little known classic horror film of that era.
imbd page

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0024727/</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>very good</reviewtitle>
    <stars>4</stars>
    <reviewer>moxey</reviewer>
    <createdate>2005-08-01 17:09:24</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2005-08-01 17:09:24</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Melvyn Douglas...YOUNG.  Fay Wray.
Good acting, good copy of film.  Sound could be just a tad better.

Overall, worth watching. I was a little disappointed at the end.  No gore though :( .

Somebody keeps sucking the blood out of the townspeople.  Douglas plas a detective inspector  who at first does not believe in the occult.  Then there is the doctor, with his beautiful assistant.  Of course, the town weirdo .. who is just a bit corny.  Then there is the wacky old aunt who thinks she has every ailment in the doctors medical books.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Love these old films</reviewtitle>
    <stars>3</stars>
    <reviewer>Fred P. B.</reviewer>
    <createdate>2005-08-07 06:49:01</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2005-08-07 06:49:01</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Hmmm...  so what we have here is a mad scientist out to create life, vampirism and a mind-controlled somnambulist - in other words, an amalgum of Dracula, Frankenstein and The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari (the latter of which can be downloaded from this very site.)  Caligari has not worn well.  The Vampire Bat, on the other hand, still stands up to modern viewing.  As already noted, expect good performances from Dwight Frye (reprising his Renfield and Fritz roles in Dracula and Frankenstein respectively) and Melvin Douglas (as the brick-jawed and bone-brained hero - in the right, as it turns out, but obnoxious with it).  Faye Wray is beautiful and transparent in that 1930's 'china doll' way, but doesn't have much of a part. Lionel Atwill is hammy enough to sit well next to eggs and toast.  The true star, however, is Maude Eburn as the hypochondriac aunt (treated, by the doctor, with 'silasalic acid' and Epsom Salts, the latter of which definitely gets her on the move.)  Eburn turns in a splending early 30's comedy turn which is in itself well worth the price of admission.

What?  It's free?  Even better.

Douglas

Oh!  And there's a mob.  With flaming torches.  Lead by the Burgomaister...</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>AKA Dracula's Cabinet of Doctor Frankenstein</reviewtitle>
    <stars>3</stars>
    <reviewer>Douglas fae Aiberdeen</reviewer>
    <createdate>2005-08-17 10:03:44</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2005-08-17 10:03:44</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>nice vampire movie that scared the tobbacco juice out of me as a little kid.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>.Hoakey but effective.</reviewtitle>
    <stars>5</stars>
    <reviewer>RM115</reviewer>
    <createdate>2006-09-05 13:59:13</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2006-09-05 14:30:29</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>After having read several reviews, I was actually surprised by how good this movie was. "The Vampire Bat" may not have obtained the reputation of "Dracula" or "Frankenstein" because it so obviously borrows elements from those two movies as well as others; that aside, however, it is remarkably well-made, if I do say so myself. Mystery/suspense/horror with a nice element of sonambulism. Beautiful moving camera work in some scenes, and AWESOME title credits music (but none for the rest of the film.) 

Good acting overall - especially entertaining performances from Lionel Atwill, Maude Eburn, and Dwight Frye (can't go wrong with him). Melvyn Douglas and Fay Wray play their roles, but are sort of *blah* (I guess that's what normally comes from the romantic lead and his love interest.) 

Overall, though, definitely check out "The Vampire Bat" to see a really good forgotten horror flick. 

(Oh, BTW, this might not be the full version of the film - apparently there are some scenes in the middle that are missing? Nothing that is critical to the film, but would be interesting nonetheless.)</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Unexpectedly good, little-known horror film (long review)</reviewtitle>
    <stars>4</stars>
    <reviewer>Eregwen</reviewer>
    <createdate>2007-01-01 22:17:37</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2007-01-01 22:17:37</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Nice little film from the good ol' times... I enjoyed watching it but apparently there are some scenes missing. According to imdb.com the film runs 71 minutes. This version has only about 59 minutes... Does anybody know something about that? Is imdb.com wrong or is this a cut version of the film?</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Nice little film...</reviewtitle>
    <stars>4</stars>
    <reviewer>Jekyll</reviewer>
    <createdate>2007-01-07 23:10:17</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2007-01-07 23:10:17</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>But even the DVD releases of these Pre-Code "Majestic" films are not up to the audio quality of Douglas Shearer's MGM work.&#13;
&#13;
Just how they got Fay Wray and Melvin Douglas to do this, I don't know, but that was probably their whole budget right there.&#13;
&#13;
Regardless of the poor quality, a great flick, not really a horror movie, more like a science fiction film, the ending was fairly predictable.&#13;
&#13;
I waited until 12:30 AM to run this onto my TV, and it was more effective that way.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Not the best "Print"</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>XweAponX</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2008-06-22 20:17:05</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2008-06-22 20:17:05</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>This little gem has both Fay Wray and Dwight Fry in it, and solely based on that it is worth a viewing. However, it doesn't stand up to the other Horror flicks of the time all that well.&#13;
&#13;
Still, as I said, it is definatley woth a look.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Not without merit</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>ThobiasV</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2008-10-14 09:38:50</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2008-10-14 09:38:50</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>It should be noted that this film helped Ms. Wray's career.  She did another film with Mr. Atwill called The Mystery of the Wax Museum which lead to King Kong.  To answer a reviewer's question about the lack of music in the film; low budget pictures didn't have the money to have an orchestral score.  The music was used at that time to set the mood of the film.  Please note in classics ie Frankenstein, Dracula, the Mummy, Dr Jekyl and Mr. Hyde (1932) and Freaks it was not an esential part of the film. That is the way it was until 1935 with the Technicolor film, Becky Sharp.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Old fashion fun</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>quigs</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2008-10-15 05:45:57</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2008-10-15 05:45:57</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Not great, but enjoyable and comfortably predictable for those who enjoy these early horror films. Cute finale takes off the harder edge of the killer's demise at the close of the story.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Good entertainment</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>reen1</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-01-15 23:59:16</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-01-15 23:59:16</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Here's a not-at-all scary horror movie leavened with good comedy. It features good acting, and good dialog. The basic story is that in a modern-day - 1930s - small, German town people are being bled dry at night, there are two holes in their necks, and there are currently a lot of bats hanging (sorry) around. Kudos to the director for using shots of real bats, unusual for movies of this vintage.&#13;
&#13;
Well, hmm, the ignorant, superstitious villagers including the Burgomaster, who should know better, think vampire. They are abetted in this by the affable town doctor, played by Lionel Atwill. The doubtful police inspector, played by Melvyn Douglas, keeps his eyes on one of the doctor's assistants, played by Fay Wray, and frets as more people die. Hysteria leads to the death of the town idiot, played wonderfully by Dwight Frye, who played Renfield in &lt;i&gt;Dracula&lt;/i&gt;.&#13;
&#13;
But, no, this isn't a vampire movie. It's a Frankenstein-type movie with a madman who uses remote mind control. I would have enjoyed it more if the movie had some terror, creepiness or some frights in it.&#13;
&#13;
I downloaded the 512Kb mpeg4 file. Video and audio were fine.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Worth Watching</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>billbarstad</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-03-11 22:57:36</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-03-11 21:52:15</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>The presence of Messers Douglas, Atwill and Frye together with Fay (King Kong )Wray, gives an air of quality to this B picture and makes it very watchable in spite of its great age.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>they're all bats!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>keygrip</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2009-09-16 19:27:15</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2009-09-16 19:27:15</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>12</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>3.67</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
